The annual NIHR Doctoral Training Camp brings together promising doctoral students from across the health and care research landscape for an intensive, collaborative deep-dive into the realities of securing future funding and shaping independent research pathways.

PhD students Faiza Yahya, Lauren Lawson, Jessica McCann and Liyuan Zhu recently joined this year’s cohort on 7th-9th July in Hinckley, tackling collaborative challenges, pitch simulations, and expert masterclasses. Here, in their own words, they share their personal highlights, key takeaways, and honest reflections on what the experience meant for their evolving careers:

“I remember looking at stressed academics when they have a grant application deadline approaching, as they try to shut off from the world to get this done in time. The stress, the late nights, the extra time put in around their already busy schedule, only to then get a rejection after rejection. That was enough to put me off and terrify me from ever wanting to put together a grant application! I didn’t think that would all change by attending the NIHR Doctoral Training Camp 2026. As the camp started, I remember feeling like I was on ‘The Apprentice’, I thought “what have I let myself into!?”.  24-hours to meet a whole new team of diverse backgrounds, figure out a research question, make multiple appointments with experts (methodologists, statisticians, PPIE contributors, finance, directors) to then write a competitive application for half a million pounds, and submit this by a 5pm deadline. Not only that but present this to a tough panel the next day. Easy right?! I must say that this was one of the best experiences I have ever attended, and I was fortunate to have such a lovely team and mentor, that made this a success. I was really shocked to hear that out of 10 very good teams and projects; we won the award for best application! My key takeaways from the experience were the importance of a good team, collaboration with different expertise and great mentorship are valuable, as well as active leadership and planning. We had embedded PPIE and inclusivity throughout the project which drove and shaped the application, and we were already thinking about future applications. I am very grateful to the NIHR for creating such useful opportunities for us early career researchers and NIHR Newcastle PSRC for nominating me to attend.”

– Faiza Yahya, PhD student

“I was honoured to attend the 17th NIHR Doctoral Research Training Camp. The three-day programme provided an intensive and highly rewarding opportunity to develop essential research funding skills while collaborating with doctoral researchers from a wide range of disciplines across the UK. A key challenge of the training camp was to work in newly formed multidisciplinary teams to develop a fictitious NIHR research funding application worth £500,000 within just 24 hours. From identifying an important research question and designing an appropriate methodology to considering  PPIE, budgeting, anticipated outputs, and research impact, the exercise closely reflected the complexities of preparing a competitive funding proposal.”

“Working alongside researchers from diverse academic backgrounds highlighted the value of interdisciplinary collaboration. Although developing ideas within a newly formed team inevitably involved different perspectives and constructive debate, the experience reinforced the importance of effective communication, teamwork, and shared problem-solving in addressing complex healthcare challenges. I am sincerely grateful to the Newcastle PSRC for providing this excellent opportunity, from which I learned from experienced researchers and fellow delegates, and the knowledge, skills, and connections gained will undoubtedly support my future research career.”

– Liyuan Zhu, PhD Student

“Thank you to the NIHR academy for such an informative and challenging doctoral camp. It was fun to see familiar faces and meet fellow doctoral students from across the NIHR infrastructure. Although at times stressful, the camp was eye-opening and offered valuable insight into what a future career in academia entails.”

– Jessica McCann, PhD Student

“Attending the NIHR Doctoral Training Camp was an opportunity to connect and collaborate with PhD students from across different branches of the NIHR infrastructure. As my research sits within the theme of safer integrated health and social care environments in the NIHR Newcastle PSRC, it was great to see such a strong emphasis on the importance of social care research throughout the busy 3-day programme. I also valued the focus on lived experience and realist approaches, both of which are central to my PhD and public engagement activities with unpaid carers. The event was a well-timed opportunity to learn from others, share perspectives and reflect on how diverse areas of research can come together to address complex challenges in health and care.”

– Lauren Lawson, PhD Student

Pictured left to right – Lauren Lawson, Faiza Yahya, Liyuan Zhu, Jessica McCann

Martha’s Rule was introduced by NHS England in April 2024 after the death of 13-year-old Martha Mills in 2021, who developed sepsis in hospital following a pancreatic injury. A coroner later ruled she would likely have survived had she been moved to intensive care sooner, after her family’s concerns about her deterioration went unheeded. Following campaigning by her mother, Merope Mills, the rule now gives patients, families, carers and staff round-the-clock access to a rapid review from a critical care outreach team if they’re worried a patient is deteriorating and feel unheard. It has three parts: daily structured check-ins with patients about how they’re feeling, 24/7 staff access to an outreach team, and the same 24/7 access for patients and families.

Led by the NIHR Central London Patient Safety Research Collaboration (based at UCLH) and delivered by SafetyNet, the network of all six NIHR Patient Safety Research Collaborations, the evaluation combines national data analysis (deterioration rates, escalations, ICU admissions, mortality) with in-depth qualitative work at 16 trusts — observations, interviews, and case studies. A central aim is equity: whether the rule works as well for people with communication difficulties, cognitive impairment, language barriers, or from underserved communities as for everyone else. Health economists will also assess value for money. Patients and families with lived experience of harm are involved as equal partners, not just research subjects.

Dr Matt Cooper is leading for the North East (Newcastle PSRC) and reflected on the award: “This is a fantastic opportunity for a cross-country, collaborative evaluation of a vital pathway across our NHS. This work will ensure that we support the implementation and effectiveness of Marthas Rule in the future.”

The North East team from Newcastle PSRC includes – Dr Matt Cooper, Professor Annette Hand and Lauren Lawson. (pictured left to right)

Read the full announcement on the SafetyNet website at the following link: SafetyNet | Martha’s Rule Summative Evaluation | NIHR PSRC Network

To mark Deaf Awareness Week 2026, our Director of EDI worked with students at the Newcastle School of Pharmacy to create a short blog about D/deaf awareness, inclusive pharmacy care and how this relates, in an actionable way, to patient safety.

The theme for this year’s Deaf Awareness Week was, ‘Right to understand – Together, we break barriers.’ This theme aimed to raise awareness for the communication needs of the D/deaf community and advocate for greater access to communication tools and services to support safe and inclusive consultations with patients.

Pharmacists and pharmacy teams play a key role in creating a safe space to support members of the Deaf community and ensuring equitable access to medication services. We can do this by educating ourselves on basic sign language, maintaining face-to-face contact, utilising visual/written aids and remaining open to conversation.

“Adaptation is a constant part of my life… the solutions to help bridge the gap are versatile and very much individualised” – Annissa Wiltshire, MPharm student and member of the Deaf community

Newcastle University’s BSL workshop is a great example of how we can undergo further training to educate ourselves. Newcastle Alumni and Foundation Trainee Pharmacist, Christina Newell, found the BSL training be “invaluable” in informing her work: “[doing BSL] pushed me to be a better healthcare professional with patients and carers who use this language to communicate. It also helped me develop different skills, such as being patient, knowing how to communicate with others using my body language and how to be focused and attentive to somebody when communicating with them.”

In pharmacy practice, ensuring information is clear, adaptable, and responsive to individual needs is essential to delivering safe, person-centred care and reducing health inequalities.

Blog post written by: Melika Ghazi-Nouri, Annissa Wiltshire, and Cristina Newell.

What can we learn from someone who has spent more than thirty years navigating complex health challenges? As This Curious Life begins its Global Conversation on Multiple Health Conditions, Victoria Bartle’s story offers a powerful reminder that some of the most important expertise in healthcare does not always come from textbooks, research papers or data. Sometimes it comes from the people living the reality every day. 

At the NIHR Newcastle PSRC, we are dedicated to improving safety and care for people living with multiple long-term conditions. While our research relies on rigorous scientific frameworks, Victoria’s insights highlight exactly why data alone isn’t enough. True progress happens when we combine clinical data with the deep, practical wisdom of patients who manage these complexities every single day.

Victoria’s journey shines a light on the questions that spreadsheets simply cannot answer—and reminds us who we are ultimately innovating for.

We invite you to dive into this insightful piece, explore the realities of navigating long-term conditions, and join the global conversation:

The Question Data Couldn’t Answer – This Curious Life

Victoria Bartle

This Dementia Action Week, we shared examples of education and research efforts led by people in our PSRC…

First up: Dr Anna Robinson-Barella, our Director of EDI in the PSRC, recently collaborated with colleagues at NIHR Join Dementia Research to film a short series about how pharmacists can support people impacted by Dementia (including patients and their carers/friends/family members). 💙🌼🎥  

Anna interviewed Sarah, who spoke about her experiences being a carer for her Mam, who was living with dementia. She discussed ways that pharmacists and wider members of the pharmacy team can support those impacted by dementia and the videos complemented teaching for teaching on the Master of Pharmacy degree at Newcastle University.

This work was supported by Anna’s collaborators: Dan Duhrin, Nichol Quinn and Lisa Duggan-Howarth at NIHR JDR.

Next: is work done by PSRC PhD researcher, Lauren Lawson, and her supervisory team (Dr Matt Cooper, Dr Clare Tolley, Prof Annette Hand and Prof Hamde Nazar). Lauren’s second publication from her PhD is titled “There doesn’t seem to be the help there for people who are carers”: Qualitative findings from a realist evaluation of hospital-to-home transitions. 💙

Read it here: https://academic.oup.com/innovateage/advance-article/doi/10.1093/geroni/igag056/8687114?login=true.

Lauren’s study looked at the experiences of unpaid carers supporting older adults with dementia and long-term conditions, when moving from hospital back home. 🏥

Findings suggested that many carers felt overwhelmed, unsupported, and unsure where to turn for reliable information, highlighting the need for clearer communication and more personalised support when someone with dementia and long-term conditions leaves hospital.

I am delighted to introduce myself as a new Clinical Research Fellow in Patient Safety and a member of the Academic Career Development (ACD) team here at the NIHR Newcastle PSRC. Joining the NIHR Newcastle PSRC is a fantastic privilege and something that I fully intend to make the most of. This opportunity feels like a natural next step in my research journey that has always been focused on making healthcare work better for the people who need it most.

My Background:

I am a Physiotherapist by background and am starting this position as a secondment from my NHS Trust – Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV). My clinical career to-date has covered both in patient and community physical health settings, before a transition to working specifically within inpatient mental health settings for working age adults.

In these roles, I saw first-hand how complex the intersection of physical and mental health can be. It became clear to me that patients with severe mental illness (i.e. psychosis, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder) often face many difficulties, not just from their primary diagnosis, but from the challenges of managing their physical health within a mental health setting. This is one of the areas that I hope to improve through my own research.

My Research Journey:

My introduction to clinical research was via a 9-month NIHR internship, leading to a 2-year part-time NIHR Pre-doctoral Clinical Academic Fellowship (PCAF). Following this I began my PhD part-time alongside my clinical work via a partnership between TEWV and York St John University.

My PhD has involved focusing on the complex relationship between physical symptoms (such as walking and daily functioning) and psychological symptoms (specifically anxiety and depression) in people living with Parkinson’s. This work has involved considering the perspectives of people living with Parkinson’s, their carers, and UK-based physiotherapists, alongside cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of various physical and psychological assessments. I am approaching the end of my PhD and alongside preparing to submit, I am in the process of developing some recommendations for clinical practice.

My other research interests focus on promoting sustainable long-term lifestyle and behaviour change to improve both physical and mental wellbeing. I am particularly interested in how we can move beyond short-term interventions to create lasting habits that improve quality of life. In the context of patient safety, this means looking at how health behaviours, such as physical activity and self-management, can act as a safety net, reducing the risk of secondary complications and hospital readmissions for those with complex needs.

Looking Forward:

At the NIHR Newcastle PSRC, I’ll be wearing two hats that I’m equally passionate about:

• In Academic Career Development (ACD): I know how daunting the clinical academic path can feel. Having navigated my pre-doctoral and (almost!) doctoral routes, I am excited to support others in finding their own routes into research. To me this will focus on individual development alongside supporting impactful research.
• In Patient Safety: I’ll be applying my clinical experience to help recognise risks and improve safety, particularly for populations that often fall through the cracks of traditional healthcare systems. For example, I have recently been successful in obtaining NIHR Three School Prevention funding. This will fund the PATHS to prevention project to explore current provision of physical activity support during the transition between inpatient and community mental health settings. We hope to build on the findings of this work to co-design improved pathways for maximising long-term engagement with physical activity to help both physical and mental health.

Let’s Connect:

The best research happens when we work together. Whether you’re a clinician with a nagging research question or a fellow researcher interested in mental health safety, I’d love to chat. I’m new to the PSRC and Newcastle University so I’d also love to connect with other colleagues with similar research interests.

You can find more details about my publications on ResearchGate or read more about my personal journey via Routes to Research.

My usual working days within the PSRC will be Wednesday-Friday.

Figure 1 above

How it all began?

I remember attending my first Hospital at Home Society conference in 2024. At this point, I was in the early days of the PhD, eager to learn more about current developments in this research area. During the networking breaks, I remember introducing myself to keynote speakers and little did I know that this would be the start of a wonderful collaboration and supervision for the NIHR SPARC Award.

I was keen to discuss the priority research areas for Hospital at Home (H@H) and later that year, I came across the NIHR SPARC Short Placement Award for Research Collaboration | NIHR. I felt that this was a wonderful opportunity to work with a research team that had the expertise in H@H, who operationally had the research knowledge, the technical and practical expertise in this field, and the existing networks that I could learn from and engage with moving forward. Additionally, my aspirations for professional development to become a clinical academic drove my passion to work with a group of dedicated and trailblazing clinical academics. I felt this would strengthen my experience, especially when considering post-doctoral opportunities.

What is the SPARC award for?

The NIHR SPARC Award allows NIHR academy members to spend time with researchers across other NIHR infrastructure to enhance their personal and professional development and research training experience. From speaking to previous candidates, I learned that this is usually either to develop skills in particular research methods, or to develop collaborations and expertise from researchers in a particular field.

What I did?

The application itself allows you to be quite flexible in how you undertake the placement, which is helpful depending on what you want to achieve. Personally, I had set out 1 day a week over 9 months, whereas other previous applicants undertook it in block placements (e.g. in a 4-week block).

During the placement I managed to conduct clinical visits to H@H services to get the first-hand practical experience. I attended clinical meetings and research meetings linking in with other health tech research centres in the NIHR infrastructure. As part of the award, I also accounted for attending courses and conferences around implementation science and knowledge mobilisation which I felt would be useful for my professional development and demonstrating meaningful impacts with research. The bulk of the collaborative work centred around working on a multi-phase research project. This involved a literature review and arranging an online stakeholder workshop with clinical experts nationally to discuss the findings. This also involved working with a visual minutes artist and presenting the findings at the UK Hospital at Home Society Conference 2026, at the Royal College of Physicians in Edinburgh, which supported input into the survey with H@H practitioners.

Outputs of the placement?

This placement allowed us to develop a Taxonomy of Medicines Safety in Hospital at Home which is aimed for upcoming publication. This enables a better understanding of the concepts of medicines safety in H@H and the links between them. Although the aim of the placement is professional development, I was fortunate to have an abstract accepted for oral presentation at the UK Hospital at Home Society conference in 2026, which is planned for submission to the Journal of Advanced Home Medicine. Additionally, a visual minutes graphic produced from this work is displayed below (See Figure 1).

Blog produced by Faiza Yahya (PhD Candidate), with acknowledgements to the support and supervisory team at the University of Warwick (Professor Daniel Lasserson, Dr Ciara Harris, Sophie McGlen) and the NIHR for funding this award. Appreciation also goes to the Academic Career Development Leads (Newcastle University and NIHR ARC West Midlands) for making this happen.

When “help” might harm: understanding the safety of social prescribing

Social prescribing has become a cornerstone of person-centred care, connecting people to community support, reducing pressure on services, and improving wellbeing. But what happens when these interventions don’t go as planned?

In our recent study, we looked beyond effectiveness to explore an underexamined issue: the potential harms of social prescribing. Using a global umbrella review of existing evidence, we developed a “dark logic” model (a way of mapping how unintended negative consequences might arise).

What did we find?

While social prescribing can offer important benefits, the evidence base highlights several areas of potential risk:

1. Mismatch between needs and services – when referrals don’t align with individual circumstances, leading to frustration or disengagement
2. Equity concerns – where access to community resources is uneven, potentially widening inequalities
3. Burden transfer – shifting responsibility onto individuals or overstretched voluntary sector services
4. Psychological impacts – including feelings of stigma, rejection, or failure if support pathways break down

Importantly, many of these harms are not the result of single decisions, but emerge through complex systems of care, commissioning, and delivery.

Why this matters for patient safety

Patient safety conversations have traditionally focused on clinical interventions. Our findings suggest we need to extend that thinking into community-based and non-medical models of care.

Social prescribing operates across organisational boundaries (primary care, local authorities, and the voluntary sector) which can create gaps in oversight, accountability, and follow-up. Without careful design, implementation, and evaluation, there is a risk that well-intentioned interventions could inadvertently contribute to harm.

What can we do differently?

Our “dark logic” model is not about discouraging social prescribing, but about making it safer and more equitable. Key implications include:

• Building safety considerations into service design from the outset
• Strengthening monitoring of outcomes beyond uptake and satisfaction
• Supporting the voluntary and community sector to deliver sustainable services
• Ensuring equity is a central focus in referral pathways and access
• Recognising and addressing the emotional and psychological experiences of participants

Looking ahead

As social prescribing continues to grow, there is an important opportunity to embed patient safety principles into its development. This means moving beyond asking “does it work?” to also asking “for whom, in what contexts, and at what cost?”

By bringing a safety lens to this evolving area of practice, we can better ensure that social prescribing delivers on its promise, without leaving unintended harms unseen.

Call to action

We encourage researchers, practitioners, commissioners, and community partners to actively incorporate safety thinking into social prescribing policy and practice. This includes:

• Designing services with potential harms in mind, not just intended benefits
• Sharing learning on unintended consequences across organisations and sectors
• Embedding routine monitoring of safety outcomes in evaluation frameworks
• Involving patients and communities in identifying what “safe” support looks like in practice

By working collaboratively and proactively, we can ensure that social prescribing not only supports wellbeing, but does so safely, equitably, and sustainably.

Paper link – https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/16/5/e108998.abstract